Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Is your refrigerator running . . . because I think I might vote for it

 Shamlessly stolen from reddit r/jokes

For the first time since I was 18, I have no idea for who to vote. With the exception of Ron Paul, I have always voted Libertarian. But in this bizarre election even the libertarian candidate is, well, he's kind of an idiot. 

Regardless, of your thoughts on vaccinations, anyone can see that this is not the libertarian view.
So what else does he not understand about freedom?

I can't stop thinking of the pussies, dicks and assholes speech from Team America; World Police and how accurately it the describes this election's three candidates. 

In this case Gary Johnson is, of course, the pussy, Hilary Clinton is the asshole, and Donald trump is the dick.

 See, there's three kinds of people: dicks, pussies, and assholes. Pussies think everyone can get along, and dicks just want to fuck all the time without thinking it through. But then you got your assholes, Chuck. And all the assholes want us to shit all over everything! So, pussies may get mad at dicks once in a while, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes, Chuck. And if they didn't fuck the assholes, you know what you'd get? You'd get your dick and your pussy all covered in shit! .    .   .

Pussies don't like dicks, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes: assholes that just want to shit on everything. Pussies may think they can deal with assholes their way. But the only thing that can fuck an asshole is a dick, with some balls. The problem with dicks is: they fuck too much or fuck when it isn't appropriate - and it takes a pussy to show them that. But sometimes, pussies can be so full of shit that they become assholes themselves... because pussies are an inch and half away from ass holes

So far, in all the research and agonizing over candidates I've done I have to say, the pussies, dicks and assholes speech is the most intelligent and accurate analysis I've come across.
Of course, I am hoping for Trump over Hilary for purely selfish reasons. Trump is less likely to affect me personally. He also can't be blackmailed by anything he's said or done because he doesn't care, he's never danced naked at Bohemian Grove because he's not a traditional insider and ya I think he's a shoe in; barring election fraud. 

My ideology would normally lend toward voting for a pussy, this particular pussy doesn't seemed to understand what it means to be a true pussy.. And there is no hope anyway of pussy getting elected in this two genital system.  So I have to hope for a dick, which I prefer over an asshole.

I don't think I'll actually go so far as to vote for a dick, because despite it's asshole tendencies, my heart still belongs to pussy.


Wednesday, October 05, 2016

Duke's new men's program for “male-identified” students discusses male privilege, patriarchy, “the language of dominance,” rape culture, pornography, machismo and other topics.

Remember ladies, this image is suppose to a bad thing

Alex Bressler, another junior on the leadership team, said the program would help men “proactively deconstruct our masculinity.”

I have spoken with women who have this mindset (the mindset that men need to be reprogrammed) and unfortunately they have spoken rather candidly with me about their beliefs (my third child was born on campus at Yale Law- when I tell you I have lived among them, I am not kidding). I'll give it to you in nutshell. 

They do not want men around at all. 

What men are around in their perfect world, should be emasculated subs at their beck and call. 

 His shirt reads, "This is what feminism looks like".

They see a beautifully non-violent future where social justice is the highest law of the land, all babies are test tube products (so women never have to be slaves to parasitic babies) and all babies are most importantly all female.

Of course they intentionally ignore lesbian violence;
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s 2010 National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey reports on the lifetime prevalence of rape, physical violence or stalking by an intimate partner, focusing for the first time on victimization by sexual orientation. It finds a victimization prevalence of 43.8 percent for lesbians, making it the second most affected group after bisexual women (61.1 percent), ahead of bisexual men (37.3 percent), heterosexual women (35 percent), heterosexual men (29 percent) and homosexual men (26 percent).[9]
But they can deal with little meaningless internal issues like the outrageous rate of violence among lesbians later on when their revolution has eliminated all the true undesirables and infidels by birth.

For real, they want all men to go away forever

 Hashtag #killallmen is a thing

To better understand where they come from try to remember that almost all of academia are actually sociopaths. Like true sociopaths they have no problem with a little PeopleIdonotlike-o-cide. 

The first step in getting rid of men is to just plain make them illegal. 

They can't really do that, right now anyway, but they can make everything it is to be male a target. Their body language, their instincts, their desires are all deemed hate speech. 

Their need to protect, well, it's all unnecessary because in this Brave New World there is no violence and no guns (remember we're not allowed to talk about violence among plumber's crack lesbians).

Everything men say and do from holding the door to fixing your flat tire is male violence and a display of rape culture. 

This man is a rapist

Heetstreet   has a great piece on Duke's new program; the quote below is theirs.
Duke’s new program is patterned off of a similar one at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, where participants are asked to contemplate how masculinity plays a harmful influence in lives.

There the program seeks “to shift the culture of masculinity toward more non-violent norms”—the underlying assumption being that violence is currently the norm for men.

Remember it's not verbal violence when it looks like this

I'm not worried about this movement actually busting too far out of its academia cage. I have faith that the rest of humanity, and by humanity 
I mean people who are capable of feeling emotions, all fully realize how ridiculous this is.  

I understand that their whole goal is to offer programs like this one voluntarily at first and just like everything else they do, the next step is to make it legally required. 

But before they force men to obtain a permit to keep their testicles and a three day waiting period for pre-approved very polite sex; I think society will backlash against it all.

Because really some women just need to have their hair pulled.



10 Years of Narcissistic Tirades

After looking through old posts I can see that this started out as basically a mommy blog, then somewhere along the line I thought I was a political editorialist. At one point I made some internet friends along the way; like Becky Chandler who really had a thing going on with her blog until too many boobs became her google downfall (I've had that problem myself).

After my husband started his veteran's group/org, I noticed I started using this as a ranting space for the frustrations of being "that guy's" wife. Blogs have really become redundant with Facebook being such a universal (though unpaid) place to vent, commiserate, and console. The downside, of course, is that you are venting to your own friends and family instead to an anonymous crowd. There is no anonymous for me anymore. Every word I type whether it's a private word doc or a published Twitter smartassity is watched and re-watch, not for actual criminal activity but for what might sound really bad if read to a jury out of context. 

It's been so long now that even when I ignore this space, I still think of it as a friend. I draft up posts in my mind that I'll never write as part a constant internal dialogue. I am very limited now as to how personal my rants can be as it is not only not anonymous, but also read by people who really hate us, like hate group hate us for our political beliefs.

I don't like to make promises but I love, I mean really love this blog. I'm like a workaholic husband who ignores his wife for years but would be devastated if she left. So like said husband maybe I'll buy her some grocery store flowers and take her to a chain restaurant so she doesn't feel so ignored; look I even updated it a little and bonus points, I didn't forget our anniversary. 

Sunday, October 19, 2014

Changing Stripes

I'm having a bit of a design crisis. 

I like the sleek, modern look of Blogger's new dynamic views but I dislike the lack of control, most notable that you can't use a stat counter. It also removes formatting for the post summaries; mixing in photo captions, without context, in with the text body; rendering most of my text summaries totally unintelligible.

For the moment, I have the background black but since I have hundreds of posts with dark grey text, meant to be visible against the pink my blog has been dressed in for years, I doubt I'll stay married to this high maintenance look.

I'll think on this darker look a bit more but some older post just aren't compatible with the modern Blogger and you simply can't change the text color anymore.

Anyway, if you just have to read an old post that appears blank - just highlight it. You'll probably find all the secret messages I use to leave for friends and enemies in hidden text to catch them googling themselves.


Saturday, October 18, 2014

My blog's 8th aniversary!

I can't believe I missed my October 6th blog anniversary!

It's harder and harder to find time for this old friend of mine. I thought I was busy eight years ago with my lawyer husband, four homeschooled kids and two dogs in a cabin out in Big Arm, MT.  Now I have six homeschooled kids, four dogs, forty chickens and frankly, just being the wife of the Oath Keeper guy is a full time job by itself.

 Poor baby stayed out in the cold all night
Hopefully this year we'll add goats and sheep to the mix, as well, and at 40-something I am toying with the idea of one more round in the baby department. I do wish I was a few years younger though, but don't we all.
So much to rant about and generally my sarcastic snippets are more likely to be vented in short bursts on Reddit and Facebook than in a drawn out post.

Well, here's to eight more years of nonsensical, disorganized bitching.


Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Expansion of the terrorist watchlist requires neither “concrete facts” nor “irrefutable evidence”

Well, well, well, back in 2004 my husband had about 100 books laying open on his desk and his auxiliary desk (the kitchen table), each one completely filled wit

h sticky tabs, bookmarks, torn strips of paper and thousands of little notes.

His paper, Solving the Puzzle of Enemy Combatant Status, was the product of those endless nights of note scribbling and is a brilliant fucking masterpiece (and like most masterpieces also really fucking depressing).

It basically lays out predictions of how looking for Taliban terrorists back in 2001 would eventually devolve into rounding up anyone who supports individual freedom as a terrorist and what it would look like. Spoiler Alert; it looks a lot like this shit right here.

We should turn this into a drinking game. Take a drink every time you're declared an extremist, a shot when you make a watchlist, drain the bottle when supporting the constitution gets a terrorist label slapped on your forehead.


The Secret Government Rulebook For Labeling You a Terrorist

The Obama administration has quietly approved a substantial expansion of the terrorist watchlist system, authorizing a secret process that requires neither “concrete facts” nor “irrefutable evidence” to designate an American or foreigner as a terrorist, according to a key government document obtained by The Intercept.

The “March 2013 Watchlisting Guidance,” a 166-page document issued last year by the National Counterterrorism Center, spells out the government’s secret rules for putting individuals on its main terrorist database, as well as the no fly list and the selectee list, which triggers enhanced screening at airports and border crossings. The new guidelines allow individuals to be designated as representatives of terror organizations without any evidence they are actually connected to such organizations, and it gives a single White House official the unilateral authority to place “entire categories” of people the government is tracking onto the no fly and selectee lists. It broadens the authority of government officials to “nominate” people to the watchlists based on what is vaguely described as “fragmentary information.” It also allows for dead people to be watchlisted.

Over the years, the Obama and Bush Administrations have fiercely resisted disclosing the criteria for placing names on the databases—though the guidelines are officially labeled as unclassified. In May, Attorney General Eric Holder even invoked the state secrets privilege to prevent watchlisting guidelines from being disclosed in litigation launched by an American who was on the no fly list. In an affidavit, Holder called them a “clear roadmap” to the government’s terrorist-tracking apparatus, adding: “The Watchlisting Guidance, although unclassified, contains national security information that, if disclosed … could cause significant harm to national security.” Continue here

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Border Patrol Agent Draws Gun on Boy Scout

This makes me so furious, my heart is thumping in my throat.

Boy Scouts walk to different events at the 200...
Boy Scouts walk to different events at the 2005 National Scout Jamboree. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
You know, we hold nurse ins when some rouge cop tries to bully or shame a nursing mom into feeding her baby in a toilet stall (nothing like a little human E coli with lunch).

I really think these feds need a lesson in the law. It is not fucking illegal to take pictures- you fucking cock suckers (cock sucker, of course, being a term of endearment). 

I think an organized protest of iphones snapping away at the border is a good idea.

English: A CBP Border Patrol agent monitors th...

I understand the temptation. But just because you wear a badge doesn't mean you get to make up the law to suit your druthers.

I can't just threaten arrest to people for wearing crocs or to Peter Jackson for chopping up the Hobbit.

It's because of this type of thing that I don't like to let my kids go on scouting trips that cross the border into Canada.  

I feel bad sometimes because they do a lot of awesome events out in the Canadian Rockies and we're only a few miles down from the northern border (they also do a lot of stupid shit too-like hiking grizzly territory without firearms). 

From Gondola, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
From Gondola, Banff, Alberta, Canada. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
But I constantly worry that my kids, in particular, will be singled out because of who their dad is. 

Anyway, article below.


Here is the blurb on this from Reason
A group of Boy Scouts from Central Iowa received a lesson they won't forget in federal manners at a border crossing from Canada into Alaska. According to the scoutmaster, a casual snapshot of a Border Patrol agent got the group of about two dozen scouts and volunteers detained, searched—and one of them ultimately held at gunpoint  .  .    .
Continue here